‘Channeling the Mama Bear’: How Covid Closures Became Today’s Curriculum Wars – The New York Times

Advertisement
Supported by
According to a new survey, one issue is especially divisive: teaching about L.G.B.T.Q. rights and gender identity.
Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.
Claire Cain Miller and
To hear more audio stories from publications like The New York Times, download Audm for iPhone or Android.
Debates over what children are reading and learning in school, and who gets to decide, have divided school board and other state and local races nationwide. But most Americans, and especially parents of school-aged children, are satisfied with their local schools, found a new survey by Morning Consult for The New York Times. Yet there is one issue that generated more opposition than any other: teaching about gender diversity, and about the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.
This topic — more than teaching about critical race theory or social-emotional learning — was the most divisive, found the survey of 4,421 people in October. Four in 10 respondents opposed such instruction, and the same share supported it (the rest weren’t sure).
One group of people was more likely to oppose teaching about sensitive social issues and want more parental control in schools: people who said schools were closed too long during the pandemic, particularly conservatives.
On contentious issues that have drawn the attention of parents’ rights activists, respondents who identified as Democrats were significantly more likely than Republicans to support teaching them in school. But political ideology played a bigger role than party. Those who identified as conservative, and especially conservatives who thought schools were closed too long, were more likely than the typical Republican to oppose teaching these topics. Seventy percent of conservatives opposed teaching L.G.B.T.Q. rights and gender identity, for instance, compared with 84 percent of conservatives who said schools were closed too long.
Conservatives who oppose …
Forming sports teams
by gender, rather
than biological sex
73%
86%
Teaching about
L.G.B.T.Q. rights and
gender diversity
70%
84%
Teaching critical
race theory
62%
80%
Teaching about race
and racism
50%
66%
Liberals who oppose …
Forming sports teams
by gender, rather
than biological sex
55%
39%
Teaching about
L.G.B.T.Q. rights and
gender diversity
15%
23%
Teaching critical
race theory
14%
23%
Teaching about race
and racism
8%
14%
Respondents who say schools closed too long
Everyone
Conservatives who oppose …
Forming sports teams by gender,
rather than biological sex
73%
86%
Teaching about L.G.B.T.Q.
rights and gender diversity
70%
84%
Teaching critical
race theory
62%
80%
Teaching about race
and racism
50%
66%
Liberals who oppose …
Forming sports teams by gender,
rather than biological sex
55%
39%
Teaching about L.G.B.T.Q.
rights and gender diversity
15%
23%
Teaching critical
race theory
14%
23%
Teaching about race
and racism
8%
14%
Respondents who say schools closed too long
Everyone
Based on a survey by Morning Consult of 4,421 adults in Oct. 2022
By The New York Times
The parents’ rights movement in education became a central issue on the right a year ago, with bills on what can be taught in schools passing in Florida, Arizona and elsewhere, and with the surprise victory of Gov. Glenn Youngkin in Virginia. Even as economic issues have recently overtaken social ones in national races, many local elections have been about the push for more parental control in education. Recalls of school board members have tripled since before the pandemic, and political action committees have raised millions to finance races that usually cost a few thousand dollars. The races could energize voters this week, potentially helping Republicans up and down the ballot and weakening support among suburban women for Democrats.
“It seems like there’s an agenda being pushed on our children — a lot of focus on race and sexual orientation instead of teaching reading, writing and math — and parents have caught on to it,” said Amanda Tokos, a conservative school board candidate in Fort Wayne, Ind.
Ms. Tokos, a franchise owner and the mother of a middle schooler, had never considered running for office until she began fighting school closures early in the pandemic.
“My focus at the time was just getting the schools back open,” she said. “But while all this was happening, I started having parents reach out to me and share things with me, whether it was an assignment or a book or a conversation. Online school did open up some eyes with parents.”
Share of respondents who say parents need
more influence over books kids read in school
All respondents
24%
Liberals
47
Conservatives
Respondents who say schools were closed for too long
37
Liberals
61
Conservatives
Share of respondents who say parents need more influence over
books kids read in school
All respondents
24%
Liberals
47
Conservatives
Respondents who say schools were closed for too long
37%
Liberals
61
Conservatives
Based on a survey of 4,421 adults in Oct. 2022
Morning Consult
By The New York Times
This was true across political ideologies — liberals who said schools were closed too long were more likely than other liberals to oppose teaching sensitive topics and to want more control over curriculums. But the dissatisfaction is strongest among conservatives — in the survey, 44 percent of them said schools closed for too long, compared with 13 percent of liberals.
The conservatives who are most likely to be frustrated with schools are different from the typical respondent in several ways. They are overwhelmingly white, and more than half are men. They’re also more likely than the average respondent to be wealthy, over 45 and suburbanites.
Perhaps surprisingly, those without school-aged children are more likely to be dissatisfied with their local schools and less likely to say schools are teaching the right amount on divisive topics.
Carl Khay, a software engineer in San Jose, Calif., does not have children, but said education was one of his top issues, alongside the economy and border security. A registered independent, he said he votes on issues rather than party. He considered running for school board, and recently started a local chapter of Moms for Liberty, a conservative nonprofit for parental rights. The goal at chapter meetings, he said, is “to understand what is involved in the maintenance of the republic,” by making parents aware of what’s happening in schools and learning about the country’s founding documents.
“It’s just something that I really believe strongly, that things in the public education realm have gotten off the rails,” he said.
The movement, he said, is “channeling the Mama bear,” even for nonparents. “When Mama bears get upset, you don’t want to be messing with them.”
Debate over what children learn has been a feature of American public education since it was introduced on a wide scale in the 1830s. Schools are a natural place for these debates, historians said, because they’re in every community, and because of their role as molding future voters.
The controversies are always about more than the issues at hand, said Jack Schneider, a historian who studies education policy at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell. The uproar over teaching evolution in the early 1900s tapped into broader anxieties over social change, he said, and politicians used it “as a way of ensuring that their base would be ready to support other issues.”
The new survey found, as have others, that only a minority of Americans are frustrated with schools. About half are satisfied with public K-12 education in their communities, it found, and nearly 80 percent of parents are satisfied with their own children’s schooling. Even among conservative parents upset about the length of school closures, the majority of respondents said they were satisfied with their own children’s education.
Are you satisfied with your local public schools?
SATISFIED
UNSATISFIED
NO OPINION
No school-
aged children
38%
43%
At least one
school-aged child
66
30
Are you satisfied with your own child’s education?
At least one
school-aged child
20%
77%
Are you satisfied with your local public schools?
SATISFIED
UNSATISFIED
NO OPINION
No school-
aged children
38%
43%
At least one
school-aged child
66
30
Are you satisfied with your own child’s education?
At least one
school-aged child
20%
77%
Based on a survey by Morning Consult of 4,421 adults in Oct. 2022
By The New York Times
Denise Pérez, a risk analyst for a bank and the mother of a high school student in Grimes, Iowa, said she worries about the issues that have been bubbling up in her district — an effort to ban a book about a transgender girl, a school board candidate denouncing critical race theory.
“It’s confusing to me, because it’s not like parents don’t have a voice and don’t have a choice,” she said. “If you’re talking to your child’s teachers and you’re concerned about something, I can tell them I want them to do another book or activity.”
But for the vocal minority, distrust of schools’ Covid policies seems to have led to a desire for more control on a broader range of issues.
“There’s a certain resentment that comes from abrupt closures of schools and all these parents being told, ‘You go deal with it, this is your job to teach your kids,’ and then they open and one of the main talking points around schools becomes, ‘How dare these parents think they have a say in schools?’” said Natalia Mehlman Petrzela, author of “Classroom Wars: Language, Sex, and the Making of Modern Political Culture” and a historian at the New School.
“Parents are still picking up the pieces, but also feeling chastised and excluded,” she said.
Do you support or oppose these initiatives?
SUPPORT
NO OPINION
OPPOSE
Forming sports teams
by gender, rather
than biological sex
26%
53%
Teaching about
LGBTQ+ rights and
gender diversity
43
40
Mandating Covid-19
vaccinations
47
36
Teaching Critical Race
Theory
40
33
Teaching how racism
is embedded in laws
and institutions
50
31
Selective public
school admissions
50
26
Mandating standard
vaccinations
58
26
Teaching about race
and racism
60
24
Teaching social-
emotional learning
64
14
Gifted and talented
programs
7
79
Do you support or oppose these initiatives?
SUPPORT
OPPOSE
NO OPINION
Forming sports teams by gender,
rather than biological sex
26%
53%
Teaching about LGBTQ+ rights and
gender diversity
43
40
36
47
Mandating Covid-19 vaccinations
40
33
Teaching Critical Race Theory
Teaching how racism is embedded
in laws and institutions
50
31
50
26
Selective public school admissions
58
Mandating standard vaccinations
26
Teaching about race and racism
60
24
Teaching social-emotional learning
64
14
79
7
Gifted and talented programs
Based on a survey by Morning Consult of 4,421 adults in Oct. 2022
By The New York Times
The survey results make clear that among the issues under debate in the parents’ rights movement, parents are most uncomfortable with teaching about sexual orientation and gender identity. (Morning Consult and The Times asked the same questions of 4,417 adults in April, and the answers were roughly the same.)
Dale Morvaji, who works in sales in Destin, Fla., and has become a parents’ rights activist, said the Florida law known as “don’t say gay,” limiting what educators can say about gender and sexuality, spurred his interest in the issue.
“It’s just a matter of teaching young children, and we’re talking 6, 7, 8, 9-year-olds, talking to them about sex in school, and personally it’s way too young for that to occur,” he said. “It’s up to the parent to decide that, not the school system.”
When asked about a related issue — whether children should be required to play on sports teams aligned with their biological sex, rather than their gender identity — a majority of respondents said yes. Fathers of school-aged children were significantly more likely than mothers to support this requirement.
Book bans in schools have also been focused on L.G.B.T.Q. themes or characters, found an analysis by Pen America. In the Morning Consult survey for The Times, just over a third of respondents said parents should have more control over what children read in school.
Other recent surveys have reached similar conclusions about the contentiousness of L.G.B.T.Q. issues. Pew Research Center found that parents were much more likely to oppose instruction about gender diversity than about race. On divisive topics, the University of Southern California found that people were more comfortable with high school instruction on the topics than elementary instruction — but that teaching about gender identity, trans rights, sexual orientation and gay rights had the least support.
Teaching about race and racism, however, had majority support in the Times survey: Six in 10 respondents supported it, including 81 percent of liberals and 37 percent of conservatives. A quarter opposed it, and the rest said they didn’t know.
Asked specifically whether they supported instruction on critical race theory, a subject that is generally taught only at universities but has taken on symbolic significance, respondents were still more likely to say yes than no. Four in 10 supported it, driven by Democrats and Black respondents, while one-third did not (the rest didn’t know).
When the same question was asked using a definition of critical race theory instead of the term itself — the ways in which racism is embedded in American institutions and laws — support was 10 points higher.
Respondents were more supportive of teaching about historical racism than about racism today. In interviews, voters drew similar distinctions. “I was taught slavery, I was taught the Jim Crow laws, we were taught all these things, civil rights,” said Jim Desormeaux, a sales representative in Fort Wayne, Ind. “But when you look at critical race theory, it’s not that. What C.R.T. has done is taught that you’re oppressed now, today.” He started a podcast with Mr. Morvaji, which they describe as “two everyday guys discussing the politics and educational issues of our nation.”
Despite the prominent ideological gap on many topics, several issues received broad bipartisan support.
Florida, Oklahoma, Indiana and elsewhere have sought to restrict the teaching of social-emotional lessons, which focus on teaching children to manage emotions, build relationships and pursue goals. But in the survey, two-thirds of respondents, including majorities from both parties, supported teaching these skills in schools.
Putting students on different tracks based on achievement, like gifted and talented classes, had the support of four in five respondents. And on the idea of having some public school admissions be based on merit, just one quarter were opposed. In New York and San Francisco, high-profile efforts to end these practices were recently reversed.
Overall, when asked about the amount their local schools were teaching on various topics, respondents were less concerned about any of the contentious social issues than about core academics. Forty percent said they didn’t think schools were teaching enough reading, writing, math and science. Results of nationwide tests, released last month, showed the biggest declines in reading and math since the United States began measuring.
Ms. Pérez, the mother in Iowa, has been canvassing for Democratic candidates. When she talks about education with voters who disagree with her, she said, they often find common ground.
“They say public education has sucked for years,” she said. “Well, it also hasn’t been funded, and we’ve had a teacher shortage, and they haven’t been paid well. A lot of folks just don’t know.”
Audio produced by Adrienne Hurst.
Advertisement

source

About fira

Check Also

La película ‘¡Que viva México!’ se estrenará en cines en marzo – The Dallas Morning News

source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *